Distributed systems — worked graph designs

These designs describe intended system behavior and qualification requirements. Inspect the system atlas for named ports and relation participants.

Event pipeline: durable admission, work and projections

What does an acknowledgement actually promise?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 52615423ff54

Diagram legend. Frames are named graph regions. Left/right pins show required/offered participation, not a universal schedule. Filled pins are connected; hollow pins are unbound. A junction card preserves one relation's role slots.

MarkerMeaning in this diagram
↗ N19Tool / external API adapter
≋ N24Queue / log / pubsub resource
▣ N05Actor / statechart
▰ N21Database / state authority
⌕ N22Query / materialized view
◎ N38Observer / query / visitor
▣ P03Durable command / receipt
◎ P24Inspection / evidence
↦ P04Push event
⇆ P02Request / response
→ H02Value flow
⇆ H05Request / reply binding
↦ H04Event subscription
⊢ H27Derivation / provenance

Logic and ownership

A common Kotlin handler computes the new value; the authority compares the prior version and records the operation key in the same commit.

Failure and qualification

  • Queue acknowledgement, effect commit and projection position are three distinct facts.
  • At-least-once delivery requires idempotent effects; no exactly-once end-to-end claim follows from an edge.
  • Backpressure and dead-letter retention are declared transport policies.

Hyperedge roles

RelationPatternParticipants, preserving role positions
admitH02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}provider[0]: ingest.command; consumer[0]: queue.command
deliveryH02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}provider[0]: queue.delivery; consumer[0]: worker.delivery
commitH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: ledger.commit; consumer[0]: worker.effect
projectH02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}provider[0]: ledger.events; consumer[0]: view.events
traceH04 — Event subscription {#h04--event-subscription}provider[0]: worker.span; consumer[0]: trace.span
lineageH27 — Derivation / provenance {#h27--derivation--provenance}intent[0]: ingest.operation; delivery[1]: queue.deliveryRef; effect[2]: ledger.receipt

Kotlin common declaration

Import dev.shibasis.reaktor.portgraph.definition.* for this structural declaration. Behavior stays in ordinary Kotlin and binds through qualified runtime ports and adapters. Declaring a graph does not activate a system.

graphDefinition("distributed-events", "52615423ff5461a87601f2e0eeb53dc8e6fa5cdb5a76afc3c31dbab2ce28f97e") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("ingest", "Admission service", "N19", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("command", "P03", "WorkCommandV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("operation", "P24", "OperationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("queue", "Durable queue", "N24", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("command", "P03", "WorkCommandV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("delivery", "P04", "DeliveryV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("deliveryRef", "P24", "DeliveryRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("worker", "Processing actor", "N05", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("delivery", "P04", "DeliveryV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("effect", "P02", "EffectCommitV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("span", "P24", "TraceV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("ledger", "Effect ledger", "N21", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("commit", "P02", "EffectCommitV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("events", "P04", "CommittedEventV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("receipt", "P24", "ReceiptRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("view", "Materialized view", "N22", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("events", "P04", "CommittedEventV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    node("trace", "Telemetry collector", "N38", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("span", "P24", "TraceV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    relation("admit", "H02",
        Incidence("ingest", "command", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("queue", "command", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("delivery", "H02",
        Incidence("queue", "delivery", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("worker", "delivery", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("commit", "H05",
        Incidence("ledger", "commit", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("worker", "effect", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("project", "H02",
        Incidence("ledger", "events", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("view", "events", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("trace", "H04",
        Incidence("worker", "span", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("trace", "span", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("lineage", "H27",
        Incidence("ingest", "operation", "intent", 0),
        Incidence("queue", "deliveryRef", "delivery", 1),
        Incidence("ledger", "receipt", "effect", 2)
    )
}

Sharded actors: routing, supervision and replica epochs

Which actor instance owns a key after a placement change?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision b2f3314335b1

Diagram legend. Frames are named graph regions. Left/right pins show required/offered participation, not a universal schedule. Filled pins are connected; hollow pins are unbound. A junction card preserves one relation's role slots.

MarkerMeaning in this diagram
▰ N21Database / state authority
⌕ N22Query / materialized view
▣ N05Actor / statechart
≋ N24Queue / log / pubsub resource
○ P01Value / immutable snapshot
⇆ P02Request / response
◎ P24Inspection / evidence
→ H02Value flow
⇆ H05Request / reply binding
⋉ H15Partition / route
⌂ H18Supervision

Logic and ownership

Kotlin hashes a domain key using the published placement epoch. The mailbox handler serializes local state transitions and checks fencing at the storage authority.

Failure and qualification

  • A placement update requires handoff/fencing; map coordinates are not shard ownership.
  • Local actor serialization does not establish global ordering between shards.
  • Restart policy names state restoration, mailbox loss and retry behavior explicitly.

Hyperedge roles

RelationPatternParticipants, preserving role positions
placementH02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}provider[0]: registry.map; consumer[0]: router.placement
aH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: a.mailbox; consumer[0]: router.a
bH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: b.mailbox; consumer[0]: router.b
logAH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: log.appendA; consumer[0]: a.log
logBH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: log.appendB; consumer[0]: b.log
partitionH15 — Partition / route {#h15--partition--route}router[0]: router.keyspace; shard[1]: a.range; shard[2]: b.range
supervisionH18 — Supervision {#h18--supervision}supervisor[0]: supervisor.supervisor; child[1]: a.activation; child[2]: b.activation

Kotlin common declaration

Import dev.shibasis.reaktor.portgraph.definition.* for this structural declaration. Behavior stays in ordinary Kotlin and binds through qualified runtime ports and adapters. Declaring a graph does not activate a system.

graphDefinition("distributed-actors", "b2f3314335b1265d88480ce29ed2a486622b73270072b98f761b71365ebeaf89") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("registry", "Placement registry", "N21", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("map", "P01", "PlacementMapV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("router", "Key router", "N22", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("placement", "P01", "PlacementMapV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("a", "P02", "ActorCommandV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("b", "P02", "ActorCommandV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("keyspace", "P24", "KeyspaceRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("supervisor", "Actor supervisor", "N05", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("supervisor", "P24", "SupervisorRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("a", "Actor shard A", "N05", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("mailbox", "P02", "ActorCommandV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("log", "P02", "ActorAppendV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("range", "P24", "RangeRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral),
        PortDefinition("activation", "P24", "ActivationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("b", "Actor shard B", "N05", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("mailbox", "P02", "ActorCommandV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("log", "P02", "ActorAppendV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("range", "P24", "RangeRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral),
        PortDefinition("activation", "P24", "ActivationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("log", "State log", "N24", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("appendA", "P02", "ActorAppendV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("appendB", "P02", "ActorAppendV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    relation("placement", "H02",
        Incidence("registry", "map", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("router", "placement", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("a", "H05",
        Incidence("a", "mailbox", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("router", "a", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("b", "H05",
        Incidence("b", "mailbox", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("router", "b", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("logA", "H05",
        Incidence("log", "appendA", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("a", "log", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("logB", "H05",
        Incidence("log", "appendB", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("b", "log", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("partition", "H15",
        Incidence("router", "keyspace", "router", 0),
        Incidence("a", "range", "shard", 1),
        Incidence("b", "range", "shard", 2)
    )
    relation("supervision", "H18",
        Incidence("supervisor", "supervisor", "supervisor", 0),
        Incidence("a", "activation", "child", 1),
        Incidence("b", "activation", "child", 2)
    )
}

Distributed order saga: reservations and irreversible effects

Which state allows recovery after partial success?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 8b8092117f03

Diagram legend. Frames are named graph regions. Left/right pins show required/offered participation, not a universal schedule. Filled pins are connected; hollow pins are unbound. A junction card preserves one relation's role slots.

MarkerMeaning in this diagram
⇢ N06Workflow / saga
⊂ N33Policy / principal boundary
↗ N19Tool / external API adapter
▰ N21Database / state authority
⇆ P02Request / response
⊂ P20Authorization request / grant
◎ P24Inspection / evidence
⇆ H05Request / reply binding
⊂ H23Scoped authorization
↶ H17Compensation relation

Logic and ownership

Ordinary Kotlin implements the transition function from journal state and new receipts; each external step remains an explicit effect boundary.

Failure and qualification

  • Refund and cancellation can fail or be disallowed; surface unresolved compensation rather than claiming rollback.
  • Replays use recorded step identity and compare authority versions.
  • Independent authorities need a saga protocol or an explicitly qualified transaction coordinator.

Hyperedge roles

RelationPatternParticipants, preserving role positions
stockH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: stock.reserve; consumer[0]: coordinator.stock
payH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: payment.charge; consumer[0]: coordinator.payment
shipH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: dispatch.submit; consumer[0]: coordinator.dispatch
grantH23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}provider[0]: approve.grant; consumer[0]: coordinator.authority
journalH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: journal.commit; consumer[0]: coordinator.state
compensationH17 — Compensation relation {#h17--compensation-relation}coordinator[0]: coordinator.step; stock[1]: stock.release; payment[2]: payment.refund; dispatch[3]: dispatch.cancel

Kotlin common declaration

Import dev.shibasis.reaktor.portgraph.definition.* for this structural declaration. Behavior stays in ordinary Kotlin and binds through qualified runtime ports and adapters. Declaring a graph does not activate a system.

graphDefinition("distributed-saga", "8b8092117f03ae98324ad886acabb4bd540beea323873fcd1649648aa2cf210b") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("coordinator", "Durable saga coordinator", "N06", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("stock", "P02", "ReservationV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("payment", "P02", "ChargeV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("dispatch", "P02", "DispatchV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("authority", "P20", "OrderGrantV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("state", "P02", "SagaCommitV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("step", "P24", "SagaStepRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("approve", "Order approval", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("grant", "P20", "OrderGrantV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("stock", "Stock service", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("reserve", "P02", "ReservationV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("release", "P24", "CompensationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("payment", "Payment service", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("charge", "P02", "ChargeV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("refund", "P24", "CompensationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("dispatch", "Dispatch service", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("submit", "P02", "DispatchV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("cancel", "P24", "CompensationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("journal", "Saga journal", "N21", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("commit", "P02", "SagaCommitV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    relation("stock", "H05",
        Incidence("stock", "reserve", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("coordinator", "stock", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("pay", "H05",
        Incidence("payment", "charge", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("coordinator", "payment", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("ship", "H05",
        Incidence("dispatch", "submit", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("coordinator", "dispatch", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("grant", "H23",
        Incidence("approve", "grant", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("coordinator", "authority", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("journal", "H05",
        Incidence("journal", "commit", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("coordinator", "state", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("compensation", "H17",
        Incidence("coordinator", "step", "coordinator", 0),
        Incidence("stock", "release", "stock", 1),
        Incidence("payment", "refund", "payment", 2),
        Incidence("dispatch", "cancel", "dispatch", 3)
    )
}

Hybrid compute: edge admission and native regional processing

How is a graph partition lowered across incompatible hosts?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 32911535d1e8

Diagram legend. Frames are named graph regions. Left/right pins show required/offered participation, not a universal schedule. Filled pins are connected; hollow pins are unbound. A junction card preserves one relation's role slots.

MarkerMeaning in this diagram
▸ N27Runtime host / executor
⊂ N33Policy / principal boundary
⊞ N28Placement / resource pool
◆ N16Native resource / engine
▱ N26Blob / buffer / asset store
↗ N19Tool / external API adapter
⊂ P20Authorization request / grant
⇆ P02Request / response
◎ P24Inspection / evidence
▣ P03Durable command / receipt
⊂ H23Scoped authorization
⇆ H05Request / reply binding
→ H02Value flow
⌖ H21Placement

Logic and ownership

Common Kotlin selects a qualified placement from declared host capabilities. The target adapter invokes the native kernel and publishes an artifact receipt.

Failure and qualification

  • A cross-host cut replaces local call assumptions with transport, serialization and deadline contracts.
  • Capability availability does not authorize consuming a host or reading its data.
  • Native ABI support and environment limits must be admitted before scheduling.

Hyperedge roles

RelationPatternParticipants, preserving role positions
authorizeH23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}provider[0]: policy.grant; consumer[0]: edge.authority
placeH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: scheduler.allocate; consumer[0]: edge.scheduler
inputH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: artifact.read; consumer[0]: native.input
outputH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: artifact.write; consumer[0]: native.output
receiptH02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}provider[0]: native.receipt; consumer[0]: result.receipt
placementH21 — Placement {#h21--placement}region[0]: scheduler.region; host[1]: native.host; workload[2]: edge.workload

Kotlin common declaration

Import dev.shibasis.reaktor.portgraph.definition.* for this structural declaration. Behavior stays in ordinary Kotlin and binds through qualified runtime ports and adapters. Declaring a graph does not activate a system.

graphDefinition("distributed-hybrid", "32911535d1e802871c9e87232134d28060f0619f3c2f6d59e15517810ee6325d") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("edge", "Edge admission", "N27", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("authority", "P20", "WorkloadGrantV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("scheduler", "P02", "AllocateV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("workload", "P24", "WorkloadRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("policy", "Workload policy", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("grant", "P20", "WorkloadGrantV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("scheduler", "Regional scheduler", "N28", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("allocate", "P02", "AllocateV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("region", "P24", "RegionRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("native", "Native compute host", "N16", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("input", "P02", "ArtifactReadV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("output", "P02", "ArtifactWriteV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("receipt", "P03", "ComputeReceiptV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("host", "P24", "HostProfileV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("artifact", "Input / result artifacts", "N26", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("read", "P02", "ArtifactReadV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("write", "P02", "ArtifactWriteV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("result", "Result service", "N19", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("receipt", "P03", "ComputeReceiptV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    relation("authorize", "H23",
        Incidence("policy", "grant", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("edge", "authority", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("place", "H05",
        Incidence("scheduler", "allocate", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("edge", "scheduler", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("input", "H05",
        Incidence("artifact", "read", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("native", "input", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("output", "H05",
        Incidence("artifact", "write", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("native", "output", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("receipt", "H02",
        Incidence("native", "receipt", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("result", "receipt", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("placement", "H21",
        Incidence("scheduler", "region", "region", 0),
        Incidence("native", "host", "host", 1),
        Incidence("edge", "workload", "workload", 2)
    )
}

Distributed release: exact artifacts and partial rollout

What happens when only some hosts accept a candidate?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 8e854359c8e4

Diagram legend. Frames are named graph regions. Left/right pins show required/offered participation, not a universal schedule. Filled pins are connected; hollow pins are unbound. A junction card preserves one relation's role slots.

MarkerMeaning in this diagram
λ N34Build / compiler pass
▧ N35Artifact / release manifest
⧉ N36Test / Shadow scenario
⊂ N33Policy / principal boundary
⇧ N40Deployment / migration controller
▸ N27Runtime host / executor
▧ P23Artifact / schema reference
◎ P24Inspection / evidence
⊂ P20Authorization request / grant
⇆ P02Request / response
▧ H26Artifact dependency
✓ H28Evidence supports claim
⊂ H23Scoped authorization
⇆ H05Request / reply binding
⏻ H29Activation cohort

Logic and ownership

Kotlin computes a candidate plan from observed host receipts, but only the independent gate grants execution for the fingerprinted plan.

Failure and qualification

  • Per-host atomic publication does not imply simultaneous global activation.
  • Mixed-version traffic requires a compatibility protocol or a declared isolation boundary.
  • Partial rollout and stale receipts remain visible until reconciliation; rollback itself needs state and target qualification.

Hyperedge roles

RelationPatternParticipants, preserving role positions
bundleH26 — Artifact dependency {#h26--artifact-dependency}provider[0]: build.artifacts; consumer[0]: bundle.input
testH26 — Artifact dependency {#h26--artifact-dependency}provider[0]: bundle.artifacts; consumer[0]: shadow.candidate
proofH28 — Evidence supports claim {#h28--evidence-supports-claim}provider[0]: shadow.evidence; consumer[0]: gate.evidence
decisionH23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}provider[0]: gate.decision; consumer[0]: rollout.authority
aH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: a.admit; consumer[0]: rollout.a
bH05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}provider[0]: b.admit; consumer[0]: rollout.b
cohortH29 — Activation cohort {#h29--activation-cohort}candidate[0]: bundle.revision; host[1]: a.epoch; host[2]: b.epoch; reconciler[3]: rollout.reconciler

Kotlin common declaration

Import dev.shibasis.reaktor.portgraph.definition.* for this structural declaration. Behavior stays in ordinary Kotlin and binds through qualified runtime ports and adapters. Declaring a graph does not activate a system.

graphDefinition("distributed-release", "8e854359c8e4e8a7da2e4149c7cfeed85fe3ab5897c4b598c0a363c93c49bd88") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("build", "Compiler / packager", "N34", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("artifacts", "P23", "ArtifactVectorV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("bundle", "Release artifacts", "N35", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("input", "P23", "ArtifactVectorV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("artifacts", "P23", "ArtifactVectorV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("revision", "P24", "RevisionRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("shadow", "Shadow scenarios", "N36", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("candidate", "P23", "ArtifactVectorV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("evidence", "P24", "EvidenceSetV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("gate", "Independent release gate", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("evidence", "P24", "EvidenceSetV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("decision", "P20", "ReleaseDecisionV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("rollout", "Rollout controller", "N40", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("authority", "P20", "ReleaseDecisionV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("a", "P02", "AdmissionRequestV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("b", "P02", "AdmissionRequestV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("reconciler", "P24", "ControllerRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("a", "Host cohort A", "N27", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("admit", "P02", "AdmissionRequestV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("epoch", "P24", "ActivationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("b", "Host cohort B", "N27", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("admit", "P02", "AdmissionRequestV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("epoch", "P24", "ActivationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    relation("bundle", "H26",
        Incidence("build", "artifacts", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("bundle", "input", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("test", "H26",
        Incidence("bundle", "artifacts", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("shadow", "candidate", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("proof", "H28",
        Incidence("shadow", "evidence", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("gate", "evidence", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("decision", "H23",
        Incidence("gate", "decision", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("rollout", "authority", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("a", "H05",
        Incidence("a", "admit", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("rollout", "a", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("b", "H05",
        Incidence("b", "admit", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("rollout", "b", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("cohort", "H29",
        Incidence("bundle", "revision", "candidate", 0),
        Incidence("a", "epoch", "host", 1),
        Incidence("b", "epoch", "host", 2),
        Incidence("rollout", "reconciler", "reconciler", 3)
    )
}