Bolt-on capabilities — worked graph designs

These designs describe intended system behavior and qualification requirements. Inspect the system atlas for named ports and relation participants.

How does a route cross a nested feature boundary?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision ee9f93df80a6

Diagram legend. Frames are named graph regions. Left/right pins show required/offered participation, not a universal schedule. Filled pins are connected; hollow pins are unbound. A junction card preserves one relation's role slots.

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
↪ N12	Route / navigation
⌘ N10	Function / blueprint region
▤ N11	Surface / view component
⊂ N33	Policy / principal boundary
▷ P11	Execution / continuation
⊕ P19	Capability descriptor
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
⊂ P20	Authorization request / grant
↪ H36	Navigation / interaction route
⇥ H30	Boundary export / alias
⊂ H23	Scoped authorization
⊏ H19	Ownership / containment

Kotlin parses the incoming URL into a typed payload, resolves the container path and computes the return continuation.

A modal return carries a typed result to an existing activation; it does not recreate arbitrary caller state.
Missing or unauthorized routes yield an explicit outcome before activating children.
A region boundary exports selected endpoints; it does not expose the entire child graph.

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
entry	H36 — Navigation / interaction route {#h36--navigation--interaction-route}	provider[0]: entry.destination; consumer[0]: container.destination
export	H30 — Boundary export / alias {#h30--boundary-export--alias}	provider[0]: route.export; consumer[0]: container.child
screen	H36 — Navigation / interaction route {#h36--navigation--interaction-route}	provider[0]: route.destination; consumer[0]: screen.route
modal	H36 — Navigation / interaction route {#h36--navigation--interaction-route}	provider[0]: screen.approve; consumer[0]: modal.route
grant	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	provider[0]: gate.grant; consumer[0]: route.authority
ownership	H19 — Ownership / containment {#h19--ownership--containment}	parent[0]: container.owner; child[1]: route.owned; return[2]: modal.continuation

Import dev.shibasis.reaktor.portgraph.definition.* for this structural declaration. Behavior stays in ordinary Kotlin and binds through qualified runtime ports and adapters. Declaring a graph does not activate a system.

graphDefinition("capability-navigation", "ee9f93df80a63c5664c50a0c50bed123a359307443855aae9c8a61084173672e") {
    region("app", "App")
    region("feature", "Account feature", "app")
    region("modal", "Approval modal", "feature")
    node("entry", "Deep-link resolver", "N12", "app", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("destination", "P11", "RouteAddressV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("container", "Feature container", "N10", "app", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("destination", "P11", "RouteAddressV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("child", "P19", "AccountRouteV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("owner", "P24", "OwnerRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("route", "Account route", "N12", "feature", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("export", "P19", "AccountRouteV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("destination", "P11", "AccountRouteV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("authority", "P20", "RouteGrantV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("owned", "P24", "DefinitionRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("screen", "Account Surface", "N11", "feature", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("route", "P11", "AccountRouteV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("approve", "P11", "ApprovalRouteV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("modal", "Approval Surface", "N11", "modal", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("route", "P11", "ApprovalRouteV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("continuation", "P24", "ContinuationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("gate", "Route policy", "N33", "app", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("grant", "P20", "RouteGrantV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    relation("entry", "H36",
        Incidence("entry", "destination", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("container", "destination", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("export", "H30",
        Incidence("route", "export", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("container", "child", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("screen", "H36",
        Incidence("route", "destination", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("screen", "route", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("modal", "H36",
        Incidence("screen", "approve", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("modal", "route", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("grant", "H23",
        Incidence("gate", "grant", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("route", "authority", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("ownership", "H19",
        Incidence("container", "owner", "parent", 0),
        Incidence("route", "owned", "child", 1),
        Incidence("modal", "continuation", "return", 2)
    )
}

Authorization: delegation, expiry and effect admission

Can a delegated agent execute the same operation a human proposed?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision da11babd2039

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
⊂ N33	Policy / principal boundary
✧ N39	Agent / change proposer
↗ N19	Tool / external API adapter
⊢ N37	Claim / evidence record
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
○ P01	Value / immutable snapshot
⊂ P20	Authorization request / grant
⇆ P02	Request / response
→ H02	Value flow
⊂ H23	Scoped authorization
⇆ H05	Request / reply binding
⊢ H27	Derivation / provenance

Logic and ownership

Normal Kotlin policy code evaluates principal, resource, operation, revision and time, then produces a bounded decision for the current request.

Failure and qualification

A capability descriptor states what can be done; a grant identifies who may do it within which scope.
Approval expires and is bound to a plan fingerprint; changed effects need reevaluation.
A recorded grant is not ambient access to hidden graph facets or data.

Hyperedge roles

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
proposal	H02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}	provider[0]: agent.proposal; consumer[0]: gate.proposal
decision	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	provider[0]: policy.decision; consumer[0]: gate.policy
execute	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: service.operation; consumer[0]: gate.effect
receipt	H27 — Derivation / provenance {#h27--derivation--provenance}	provider[0]: gate.receipt; consumer[0]: receipt.effect
delegation	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	delegator[0]: human.delegation; delegate[1]: agent.identity; resource[2]: service.resource; admission[3]: gate.admission

Kotlin common declaration

graphDefinition("capability-auth", "da11babd2039ade15e3cdeceec7954abf8f1c9e1ceac913c8ff7ff12ec3ac849") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("human", "Human principal", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("delegation", "P24", "PrincipalRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("agent", "Agent proposer", "N39", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("proposal", "P01", "EffectProposalV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("identity", "P24", "PrincipalRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("policy", "Policy evaluator", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("decision", "P20", "PolicyDecisionV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("gate", "Effect admission", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("proposal", "P01", "EffectProposalV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("policy", "P20", "PolicyDecisionV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("effect", "P02", "PrivilegedOperationV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("receipt", "P24", "EffectReceiptV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("admission", "P24", "AuthorityRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("service", "Privileged service", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("operation", "P02", "PrivilegedOperationV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("resource", "P24", "ResourceRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("receipt", "Audit receipt", "N37", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("effect", "P24", "EffectReceiptV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    relation("proposal", "H02",
        Incidence("agent", "proposal", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("gate", "proposal", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("decision", "H23",
        Incidence("policy", "decision", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("gate", "policy", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("execute", "H05",
        Incidence("service", "operation", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("gate", "effect", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("receipt", "H27",
        Incidence("gate", "receipt", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("receipt", "effect", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("delegation", "H23",
        Incidence("human", "delegation", "delegator", 0),
        Incidence("agent", "identity", "delegate", 1),
        Incidence("service", "resource", "resource", 2),
        Incidence("gate", "admission", "admission", 3)
    )
}

Telemetry: graph attribution, sampling and privacy

How can a span identify a graph operation without leaking its payload?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 82bc1eb404f2

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
↯ N02	Effectful operation
◎ N38	Observer / query / visitor
⊂ N33	Policy / principal boundary
ƒ N01	Pure computation
↗ N19	Tool / external API adapter
⊟ N30	External system boundary
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
⊂ P20	Authorization request / grant
○ P01	Value / immutable snapshot
↦ P04	Push event
⇆ P02	Request / response
↦ H04	Event subscription
⊂ H23	Scoped authorization
→ H02	Value flow
⇆ H05	Request / reply binding
⊢ H27	Derivation / provenance

Logic and ownership

A Kotlin sampler uses deterministic operation identity and declared budget. The interceptor emits approved metadata before any exporter runs.

Failure and qualification

Observed traffic is a sampled, time-bounded claim rather than proof that all paths are healthy.
Read access and capture are sensitive effects with separate grants and redaction policies.
Trace continuity across retries and hosts requires explicit context propagation.

Hyperedge roles

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
span	H04 — Event subscription {#h04--event-subscription}	provider[0]: app.span; consumer[0]: interceptor.span
policy	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	provider[0]: policy.grant; consumer[0]: interceptor.capture
sample	H02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}	provider[0]: interceptor.envelope; consumer[0]: sampler.input
export	H02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}	provider[0]: sampler.selected; consumer[0]: exporter.input
backend	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: collector.ingest; consumer[0]: exporter.backend
attribution	H27 — Derivation / provenance {#h27--derivation--provenance}	definition[0]: app.definition; activation[1]: interceptor.activation; observation[2]: collector.observation

Kotlin common declaration

graphDefinition("capability-telemetry", "82bc1eb404f21646e7ba228dfa6fe2a6b235da41c3b9a8dac6fc6f75905a1444") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("app", "Application operation", "N02", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("span", "P24", "SpanEnvelopeV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("definition", "P24", "DefinitionRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("interceptor", "Port interceptor", "N38", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("span", "P24", "SpanEnvelopeV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("capture", "P20", "CaptureGrantV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("envelope", "P01", "RedactedSpanV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("activation", "P24", "ActivationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("policy", "Capture / privacy policy", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("grant", "P20", "CaptureGrantV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("sampler", "Sampling logic", "N01", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("input", "P01", "RedactedSpanV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("selected", "P04", "RedactedSpanV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("exporter", "OTel exporter", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("input", "P04", "RedactedSpanV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("backend", "P02", "TelemetryBatchV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    node("collector", "Observability backend", "N30", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("ingest", "P02", "TelemetryBatchV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("observation", "P24", "ObservationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    relation("span", "H04",
        Incidence("app", "span", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("interceptor", "span", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("policy", "H23",
        Incidence("policy", "grant", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("interceptor", "capture", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("sample", "H02",
        Incidence("interceptor", "envelope", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("sampler", "input", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("export", "H02",
        Incidence("sampler", "selected", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("exporter", "input", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("backend", "H05",
        Incidence("collector", "ingest", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("exporter", "backend", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("attribution", "H27",
        Incidence("app", "definition", "definition", 0),
        Incidence("interceptor", "activation", "activation", 1),
        Incidence("collector", "observation", "observation", 2)
    )
}

Service composition: retry, fallback and contract evolution

When is a fallback semantically compatible with the primary service?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision b4bd5132161b

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
↯ N02	Effectful operation
↗ N19	Tool / external API adapter
▣ N05	Actor / statechart
⊂ N33	Policy / principal boundary
≡ N31	Schema / contract definition
⇆ P02	Request / response
◉ P08	Signal / reactive state
⊂ P20	Authorization request / grant
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
⇆ H05	Request / reply binding
→ H02	Value flow
⊂ H23	Scoped authorization
⋁ H33	Fallback / preference set
λ H25	Implements / source ownership

Logic and ownership

Ordinary Kotlin evaluates error class, deadline and fallback freshness. Typed request/response DTOs remain shared KMP code.

Failure and qualification

A matching payload type is insufficient if authority, consistency or error behavior differs.
Retries consume the caller deadline and preserve idempotency identity.
Circuit state is owned per declared scope; it is not an accidental global singleton.

Hyperedge roles

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
primary	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: primary.api; consumer[0]: client.primary
fallback	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: fallback.api; consumer[0]: client.fallback
budget	H02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}	provider[0]: breaker.budget; consumer[0]: client.budget
grant	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	provider[0]: policy.grant; consumer[0]: client.authority
preference	H33 — Fallback / preference set {#h33--fallback--preference-set}	preferred[0]: primary.profile; fallback[1]: fallback.profile; selector[2]: client.selector
contract	H25 — Implements / source ownership {#h25--implements--source-ownership}	contract[0]: schema.contract; implementation[1]: primary.implementation; implementation[2]: fallback.implementation

Kotlin common declaration

graphDefinition("capability-services", "b4bd5132161b90f0191449ba3e53c883ddb5a7230646a82d03be964451d9ca6b") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("client", "Typed client logic", "N02", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("primary", "P02", "SearchV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("fallback", "P02", "SearchV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("budget", "P08", "CallBudgetV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("authority", "P20", "ServiceGrantV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("selector", "P24", "SelectorRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("primary", "Primary service", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("api", "P02", "SearchV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("profile", "P24", "ServiceProfileV1", PortPolarity.Neutral),
        PortDefinition("implementation", "P24", "ImplementationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("fallback", "Qualified fallback", "N19", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("api", "P02", "SearchV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("profile", "P24", "ServiceProfileV1", PortPolarity.Neutral),
        PortDefinition("implementation", "P24", "ImplementationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("breaker", "Circuit / budget state", "N05", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("budget", "P08", "CallBudgetV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("policy", "Invocation policy", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("grant", "P20", "ServiceGrantV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("schema", "Versioned service contract", "N31", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("contract", "P24", "ContractRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    relation("primary", "H05",
        Incidence("primary", "api", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("client", "primary", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("fallback", "H05",
        Incidence("fallback", "api", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("client", "fallback", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("budget", "H02",
        Incidence("breaker", "budget", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("client", "budget", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("grant", "H23",
        Incidence("policy", "grant", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("client", "authority", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("preference", "H33",
        Incidence("primary", "profile", "preferred", 0),
        Incidence("fallback", "profile", "fallback", 1),
        Incidence("client", "selector", "selector", 2)
    )
    relation("contract", "H25",
        Incidence("schema", "contract", "contract", 0),
        Incidence("primary", "implementation", "implementation", 1),
        Incidence("fallback", "implementation", "implementation", 2)
    )
}

Partitioning: graph cut with exported contracts and fences

Which semantics must be preserved when a region moves to another host?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 53f07b6718ea

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
⊞ N28	Placement / resource pool
▸ N27	Runtime host / executor
↗ N19	Tool / external API adapter
◆ N16	Native resource / engine
▰ N21	Database / state authority
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
⇆ P02	Request / response
⇆ H05	Request / reply binding
⌖ H21	Placement
⇥ H30	Boundary export / alias

Logic and ownership

A common Kotlin cost function ranks legal placements after policy and target capability checks; it cannot override failed legality checks.

Failure and qualification

Cutting a local pointer or borrowed resource is illegal without a qualified transfer adapter.
Authority, clock, failure, latency and cancellation contracts survive the cut.
Migrating an activation requires an epoch and state handoff; moving a diagram card does not move computation.

Hyperedge roles

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
call	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: kernel.compute; consumer[0]: service.compute
state	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: state.conditional; consumer[0]: kernel.storage
placement	H21 — Placement {#h21--placement}	planner[0]: planner.plan; edge[1]: edge.profile; native[2]: native.profile
boundary	H30 — Boundary export / alias {#h30--boundary-export--alias}	export[0]: service.export; implementation[1]: kernel.implementation; authority[2]: state.fence

Kotlin common declaration

graphDefinition("capability-partitioning", "53f07b6718ea84a95590b67dfd3164965b70738f10ef7d536d2aef6470bd4210") {
    region("system", "System")
    region("edge", "Edge partition", "system")
    region("native", "Native partition", "system")
    node("planner", "Placement planner", "N28", "system", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("plan", "P24", "PlacementPlanV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("edge", "Edge host", "N27", "edge", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("profile", "P24", "HostProfileV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("service", "Service export", "N19", "edge", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("compute", "P02", "ComputeV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("export", "P24", "ContractRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("native", "Native host", "N27", "native", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("profile", "P24", "HostProfileV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("kernel", "Native algorithm", "N16", "native", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("compute", "P02", "ComputeV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("storage", "P02", "ConditionalStateV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("implementation", "P24", "ImplementationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("state", "State authority", "N21", "native", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("conditional", "P02", "ConditionalStateV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("fence", "P24", "FenceRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    relation("call", "H05",
        Incidence("kernel", "compute", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("service", "compute", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("state", "H05",
        Incidence("state", "conditional", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("kernel", "storage", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("placement", "H21",
        Incidence("planner", "plan", "planner", 0),
        Incidence("edge", "profile", "edge", 1),
        Incidence("native", "profile", "native", 2)
    )
    relation("boundary", "H30",
        Incidence("service", "export", "export", 0),
        Incidence("kernel", "implementation", "implementation", 1),
        Incidence("state", "fence", "authority", 2)
    )
}

FFI: typed call, owned bytes and target admission

Who releases a buffer after a foreign call fails?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 724164211963

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
ƒ N01	Pure computation
⚙ N15	Device / platform adapter
◆ N16	Native resource / engine
▱ N26	Blob / buffer / asset store
⊂ N33	Policy / principal boundary
⇆ P02	Request / response
⊂ P20	Authorization request / grant
↦ P04	Push event
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
◇̸ P17	Borrowed buffer / view
⇆ H05	Request / reply binding
— H01	Exclusive binding
⊂ H23	Scoped authorization
→ H02	Value flow
⊏ H19	Ownership / containment

Logic and ownership

Kotlin prepares a typed request and invokes the admitted bridge. The adapter maps serialization, error values and resource cleanup onto the target ABI.

Failure and qualification

Kotlin/JS compilation proves no foreign-runtime parity. Each ABI and embedding host needs its own tests.
Raw addresses and borrowed views remain local to a compatible memory domain.
Cancellation is cooperative unless the target adapter explicitly supports interruption.

Hyperedge roles

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
invoke	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: bridge.call; consumer[0]: logic.call
native	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: native.compute; consumer[0]: bridge.native
buffer	H01 — Exclusive binding {#h01--exclusive-binding}	provider[0]: pool.lease; consumer[0]: native.buffer
grant	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	provider[0]: policy.grant; consumer[0]: bridge.admission
error	H02 — Value flow {#h02--value-flow}	provider[0]: bridge.failure; consumer[0]: error.failure
ownership	H19 — Ownership / containment {#h19--ownership--containment}	allocator[0]: pool.allocator; borrower[1]: native.borrow; adapter[2]: bridge.release

Kotlin common declaration

graphDefinition("capability-ffi", "724164211963e316ddea9b20c178c39615ad06a08b19db8f21156cb876ca768e") {
    region("js", "Kotlin/JS host")
    region("native", "Native target adapter")
    node("logic", "Common Kotlin logic", "N01", "js", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("call", "P02", "NativeComputeV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    node("bridge", "FFI transport adapter", "N15", "js", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("call", "P02", "NativeComputeV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("native", "P02", "NativeComputeV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("admission", "P20", "HostGrantV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("failure", "P04", "ForeignFailureV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("release", "P24", "ReleaseProtocolV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("native", "Foreign function library", "N16", "native", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("compute", "P02", "NativeComputeV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("buffer", "P17", "BufferLeaseV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("borrow", "P24", "BorrowRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("pool", "Native buffer owner", "N26", "native", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("lease", "P17", "BufferLeaseV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("allocator", "P24", "AllocatorRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("policy", "Host capability gate", "N33", "js", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("grant", "P20", "HostGrantV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("error", "Error / cancellation adapter", "N15", "js", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("failure", "P04", "ForeignFailureV1", PortPolarity.Require)
    ))
    relation("invoke", "H05",
        Incidence("bridge", "call", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("logic", "call", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("native", "H05",
        Incidence("native", "compute", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("bridge", "native", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("buffer", "H01",
        Incidence("pool", "lease", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("native", "buffer", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("grant", "H23",
        Incidence("policy", "grant", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("bridge", "admission", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("error", "H02",
        Incidence("bridge", "failure", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("error", "failure", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("ownership", "H19",
        Incidence("pool", "allocator", "allocator", 0),
        Incidence("native", "borrow", "borrower", 1),
        Incidence("bridge", "release", "adapter", 2)
    )
}

Subgraph code push: state migration and old-call draining

How does a replacement preserve both callers and mutable state?

Inspect this design · Definition JSON · revision 782330082316

Marker	Meaning in this diagram
⌘ N10	Function / blueprint region
λ N34	Build / compiler pass
⧉ N36	Test / Shadow scenario
⊂ N33	Policy / principal boundary
▸ N27	Runtime host / executor
▰ N21	Database / state authority
▧ P23	Artifact / schema reference
◎ P24	Inspection / evidence
⊂ P20	Authorization request / grant
⇆ P02	Request / response
▧ H26	Artifact dependency
✓ H28	Evidence supports claim
⊂ H23	Scoped authorization
⇆ H05	Request / reply binding
⇧ H35	State migration
⏻ H29	Activation cohort

Logic and ownership

The migration is an ordinary Kotlin function with declared preconditions. The host publishes a candidate epoch only after state and exported-contract checks.

Failure and qualification

Generation pinning preserves code/routing identity; it does not by itself provide a consistent shared-state snapshot.
Old invocations need bounded draining, explicit cancellation or a documented coexistence policy.
Rollback to an older code image may be unsafe after a noninvertible data migration.

Hyperedge roles

Relation	Pattern	Participants, preserving role positions
build	H26 — Artifact dependency {#h26--artifact-dependency}	provider[0]: candidate.source; consumer[0]: build.source
test	H26 — Artifact dependency {#h26--artifact-dependency}	provider[0]: build.bundle; consumer[0]: check.bundle
evidence	H28 — Evidence supports claim {#h28--evidence-supports-claim}	provider[0]: check.evidence; consumer[0]: policy.evidence
publish	H23 — Scoped authorization {#h23--scoped-authorization}	provider[0]: policy.decision; consumer[0]: host.admission
state	H05 — Request / reply binding {#h05--request--reply-binding}	provider[0]: state.conditional; consumer[0]: host.state
migration	H35 — State migration {#h35--state-migration}	old[0]: old.stateSchema; new[1]: candidate.stateSchema; authority[2]: state.version
activation	H29 — Activation cohort {#h29--activation-cohort}	old[0]: old.epoch; new[1]: candidate.definition; publisher[2]: host.publisher

Kotlin common declaration

graphDefinition("capability-code-push", "7823300823163d4e5ac905949bc0725e0934fc8f6ac1ce9794b4ab1c875c65fc") {
    region("control", "Control plane")
    region("data", "Data plane")
    node("candidate", "Replacement region", "N10", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("source", "P23", "SourceRevisionV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("stateSchema", "P24", "SchemaRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral),
        PortDefinition("definition", "P24", "DefinitionRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("build", "Kotlin/JS packager", "N34", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("source", "P23", "SourceRevisionV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("bundle", "P23", "BundleRefV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("check", "Compatibility / Shadow checks", "N36", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("bundle", "P23", "BundleRefV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("evidence", "P24", "EvidenceSetV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("policy", "Publication authority", "N33", "control", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("evidence", "P24", "EvidenceSetV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("decision", "P20", "PublishDecisionV1", PortPolarity.Offer)
    ))
    node("host", "Target host loader", "N27", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("admission", "P20", "PublishDecisionV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("state", "P02", "MigrationCommitV1", PortPolarity.Require),
        PortDefinition("publisher", "P24", "HostRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("old", "Old activation epoch", "N10", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("stateSchema", "P24", "SchemaRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral),
        PortDefinition("epoch", "P24", "ActivationRefV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    node("state", "State authority", "N21", "data", ports = listOf(
        PortDefinition("conditional", "P02", "MigrationCommitV1", PortPolarity.Offer),
        PortDefinition("version", "P24", "StateVersionV1", PortPolarity.Neutral)
    ))
    relation("build", "H26",
        Incidence("candidate", "source", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("build", "source", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("test", "H26",
        Incidence("build", "bundle", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("check", "bundle", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("evidence", "H28",
        Incidence("check", "evidence", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("policy", "evidence", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("publish", "H23",
        Incidence("policy", "decision", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("host", "admission", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("state", "H05",
        Incidence("state", "conditional", "provider", 0),
        Incidence("host", "state", "consumer", 0)
    )
    relation("migration", "H35",
        Incidence("old", "stateSchema", "old", 0),
        Incidence("candidate", "stateSchema", "new", 1),
        Incidence("state", "version", "authority", 2)
    )
    relation("activation", "H29",
        Incidence("old", "epoch", "old", 0),
        Incidence("candidate", "definition", "new", 1),
        Incidence("host", "publisher", "publisher", 2)
    )
}

Bolt-on capabilities — worked graph designs

Navigation: nested containers, deep links and modal return

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration

Authorization: delegation, expiry and effect admission

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration

Telemetry: graph attribution, sampling and privacy

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration

Service composition: retry, fallback and contract evolution

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration

Partitioning: graph cut with exported contracts and fences

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration

FFI: typed call, owned bytes and target admission

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration

Subgraph code push: state migration and old-call draining

Logic and ownership

Failure and qualification

Hyperedge roles

Kotlin common declaration